The Data Retention (EC Directive) Regulations 2009 came into force
on 6 April. The Regulations require public communications service providers (CSPs) – including internet,
telephone, and email service providers – to retain communications data for a
period of 12 months after the date of the communication.
For the purposes of the Regulations, “communications data” means the traffic,
location, and other electronic data necessary to identify the subscriber or user
of a particular service, e.g., data showing when a person made or received a
call, the number called, the length of the call, and the person’s location
when they made the call. It does not include the content of
The Government argues the Regulations are necessary to combat terrorism and
fight other serious crimes, such as drugs trafficking, human trafficking,
hacking, and fraud. This argument has not appeased privacy
campaigners, however, who insist the Regulations exist solely to enable the Government to
access a ‘big brother’ style database, akin to the one in George Orwell’s dystopian classic 1984.
The Regulations will complete implementation of EC Data Retention Directive 2006/24/EC into UK law. According to Computerworld, however, a number of other member states –
Austria, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands, Poland, and Sweden – have delayed
implementing the Directive.
Indeed, the European Commission has decided to sue Sweden for failing to
implement the earlier and less stringent Data Retention (EC Directive) Regulations of 2007 (which the
2009 Regulations supercede).
Computerworld reports that instead of hurrying the
implementation process, some Swedish politicians believe the suit represents the perfect opportunity
to challenge the data retention laws (both old and new) under the European Convention on Human Rights.
You may also like:
- In the courts: Trump to fight windfarm proposals in UK…
- International: International Criminal Court to examine 2008 Georgia-Russia war
- Criminal law: Jury informed Becky Watts death was sexually motivated
- Corporate law: Libor riggers bribed with beer and curry
- Consumer law: Sainsbury’s accused of exploiting legal loophole in 5p…