An employment tribunal has ruled that a law firm made a male employee redundant because it feared a sex discrimination claim if it dismissed his pregnant co-worker. As a result, it awarded the man £123,000 in damages for unfair redundancy / dismissal and sex discrimination.
The law firm, Eversheds, has appealed the ruling.
According to John De Belin, both he and his pregnant co-worker Angela Reinholz faced redundancy from Eversheds’ Leeds office. The firm undertook an assessment of both employees’ abilities using a points system.
De Belin lost by a half a point and the Eversheds made him redundant in February 2009. Mr De Belin learned, however, that assessors ‘unfairly inflated’ Ms Reinholz’s test score on one of the criteria – securing ‘lock-up’ payments – because she was on maternity leave during the assessment period.
Tribunal judge Jeremy Shulman said: “We do not find that the Sex Discrimination Act was intended to protect a woman on maternity leave in a redundancy scoring exercise where we find that she received an unfairly inflated score, when all other scores were actual, the notional score being designed to defeat a tribunal case by Ms Reinholz.”
** Additional Information & Advice **
Alternatively, you may prefer to speak with an employment law solicitor. You can find a solicitor in your area for free via solicitor matching services, which can also help you to understand the best course of action for your situation and whether you are ready to hire a solicitor.
- Redundancy Rights: Unscrupulous Employers Target Pregnant Women
- Redundancy During Pregnancy Or Maternity Leave
You may also like:
- Northern Ireland: High Court rules abortion ‘law incompatible with human…
- Policing: Watchdog rules that Police Scotland broke law by spying…
- International: Saudi Arabia threatens to ‘sue people who compare them…
- In the courts: Ex-pupil wins sexting case
- Terrorism: Prime Minister announces £5m funding for Commonwealth counter-terrorism unit