A federal court judge in California has ruled the state’s prohibition on gay marriage is unconstitutional.
In a 136-page ruling issued yesterday, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker said the ban “fail[ed] to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license.”
“Indeed,” he added, “the evidence shows [the ban] does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same-sex couples.
“Because California has no interest in discriminating against gay men and lesbians, and because [the ban] prevents California from fulfilling its constitutional obligation to provide marriages on an equal basis, the court concludes that [it] is unconstitutional.”
California voters approved the ban, known as “proposition 8″, in a 2008 referendum, and gay rights campaigners launched a legal challenge shortly afterward. In 2009, the California State Supreme Court upheld the ban.
Despite the federal court ruling, the gay marriage ban will remain after Chief Judge Walker allowed a temporary “stay”, or suspension, of the ruling pending an appeal.
The case will now move the federal Court of Appeal for the 9th Circuit (NB. this “circuit” covers a huge swathe of territory in the western United States), before potentially moving to the U.S. Supreme Court for its final day of reckoning.
- Proposition 8 Overturned, Now What? (Law & Daily Life)
- Proposition 8, California’s ban on gay marriage, overturned by judge (Guardian)
- Marriage and Civil Partnerships (Findlaw.co.uk)
- Straight Couple Denied Civil Partnership Launch ECHR Appeal (The Solicitor)
You may also like:
- In the courts: High Court rules benefit cap discriminates against…
- Telecoms law: Cinema company ‘bewilders’ Church of England by banning…
- Policing: Watchdog rules that Police Scotland broke law by spying…
- International: Journalists stand trial in Vatican Holy See scandal
- Media law: Tim Yeo loses Sunday Times libel case