In an unprecedented court case for UK legal history, a juror has been accused of contempt of court for using Facebook to contact a defendant.
Joanne Fraill was serving as a juror on a 10-week trial for an important drug crime case in Manchester.
She allegedly used Facebook to contact Jamie Sewart, a defendant in the trial who had recently been acquitted, although there were still other defendants to be tried.
Ms Fraill is also accused of using the internet to research the other defendants in the trial after being expressly told by the judge to only use evidence given in court on which to base her decision.
Prosecutor Angus McCullough QC said: “Ms Fraill contacted Ms Sewart via the internet and conducted an online conversation with her.
“The discussion took place at a time when the jury still had outstanding verdicts to return on the case.
“That contact and discussion were in direct breach of the judge’s repeated directions to the jury that they should not discuss the case with anyone outside their number, and constituted a contempt of court.”
A contempt of court is committed when someone interferes with the administration of justice.
If they are found guilty, both Ms Fraill and Ms Sewart could face up to two years in jail.
You may also like:
- Prisons: Prime Minister outlines government prison reform proposals in speech
- Family law: Caesarean ordered if needed by judge over concerns…
- Terrorism: Parents of IS suspect, ‘Jihadi Jack,’ arrested for attempting…
- Policing: New police guidelines recommend police stop raids on suspected…
- Medical law: Mother awarded compensation after doctors performed caesarean without…
If you cannot find what you are looking for on Findlaw.co.uk please let us know by contacting us at: email@example.com.
Furthermore, please be aware that while we attempt to ensure all our information is as up-to-date and relevant as possible occasionally some our articles may no longer be accurate.