In an unprecedented court case for UK legal history, a juror has been accused of contempt of court for using Facebook to contact a defendant.
Joanne Fraill was serving as a juror on a 10-week trial for an important drug crime case in Manchester.
She allegedly used Facebook to contact Jamie Sewart, a defendant in the trial who had recently been acquitted, although there were still other defendants to be tried.
Ms Fraill is also accused of using the internet to research the other defendants in the trial after being expressly told by the judge to only use evidence given in court on which to base her decision.
Prosecutor Angus McCullough QC said: “Ms Fraill contacted Ms Sewart via the internet and conducted an online conversation with her.
“The discussion took place at a time when the jury still had outstanding verdicts to return on the case.
“That contact and discussion were in direct breach of the judge’s repeated directions to the jury that they should not discuss the case with anyone outside their number, and constituted a contempt of court.”
A contempt of court is committed when someone interferes with the administration of justice.
If they are found guilty, both Ms Fraill and Ms Sewart could face up to two years in jail.
You may also like:
- Prisons: EU court rules prisoner voting ban lawful
- Immigration law: Home Office compensates pregnant asylum seeker over detention
- Motoring law: Drivers given 10-minute ‘grace’ period in private car…
- Consumer law: Consumer Rights Act provides 30-day refund guarantee
- Immigration law: Home Secretary announces plans to limit asylum seeker…